When COVID-19 sent millions home to fashion makeshift offices, the workplace changed forever, and that seemed like a positive transition. People say they appreciate their newfound flexibility—even if it turns out it isn’t altogether healthy. While remote work and flexible schedules continue to be effective methods for attracting and retaining employees, research has shown that the perk comes at a cost: a lack of healthy work-life boundaries.
Loosely defined, a work-life boundary is the line that separates work life from personal life. And technology has blurred this line. It’s now possible to work from home, and it’s tough to stop working from home. When the workstation is just steps away, it’s difficult to, well, step away. A 2022 study showed that 62% of workers reported working more hours (McClean, 2022), with home-based workers putting in more hours than their on-site counterparts (Felstead & Henseke, 2017; Wu & Chen, 2020).
Of course, individuals experience the stress of this differently, and the idea of boundaries differs from person to person and even from day to day. It doesn’t always mean completely separating work and nonwork. Boundaries manage how they interplay—so work stress doesn’t infiltrate nonwork time. But be aware that even those who say they enjoy integrating work with life—taking business calls at a soccer game or answering emails after everyone’s in bed—are increasingly stressed by this integration, studies show (Allen et al., 2020; Mellner et al., 2021).
Leaders assume that this new, flexible schedule keeps teams happy and engaged. But flexibility and healthy work-life boundaries are not synonymous, and leaders shouldn’t rely on flex time to keep their teams happy. Flexibility is only weakly associated with better outcomes for workers (Truist Leadership Institute research; French & Shockley, 2020). If an employee is dialing in to a meeting during dinner with the family, for example, they’re likely distracted and disengaged. This overload can lead to burnout and even illness, which can result in quitting—or its alternative, quiet quitting, where workers do the bare minimum to keep their jobs.